GROUNDS NEWSLETTER APRIL
2010
PQS - ECB Pitch Quality Standard Consultations
Last year
Premier League and other clubs were offered Pitch Consultations by the ECB
trained consultants Nick James (Heaton
Consultations
for 14 clubs will have been completed by the end of April and detailed reports
issued.
Consultations
are being offered for a further 10 clubs
in 2010 2011.
Applications
should be made in writing by email asap
and not later than 30th April
to:
john @bygate.fslife.co.uk
name, email address and
telephone number of who should be contacted.
Applications will be considered in order of receipt.
Details attached of:
Ist Xl ECB PITCH MARKING 201l
GROUND CRITERIA
2ndXl PITCH MARKING
WICKET ROLLING RESEARCH
UMPIRES PITCH MARKING page 2 follows
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Grading Criteria |
Inconsistency |
Seam Movement |
Carry & Bounce |
Turn |
Mark |
|
||||||||||
|
Very Good |
|
None |
Good |
None |
5 |
|
||||||||||
|
Good |
Little |
|
Just
lacking |
Little |
4 |
|
||||||||||
|
Above Average |
Occasional |
Occasional |
Lacking |
|
3 |
|
||||||||||
|
Below Average |
More
than occasional |
More
than occasional |
Minimal |
More
than occasional |
2 |
|
||||||||||
|
Poor |
Excessive |
Excessive |
Very
minimal |
Excessive |
1 |
|
||||||||||
|
Unfit |
A pitch is only rated unfit if it is dangerous |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Marks |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
16 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
·
Add up the scores for each of the Categories to provide
the Total Pitch Score. ·
In the event of a spinner not bowling in the
match and it is not possible to score Category Turn, A mark of 3 should be given to
enable the calculation of the Total Pitch Score |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Comments |
YES |
NO |
||||||||||||||
|
Did the pitch appear dry
before the match? |
|
P |
||||||||||||||
|
Did the pitch have a
uniform covering of grass along its length? |
P |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Were pitch markings
correct and clear? |
P |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Were old footholes filled/repaired before
the match? |
P |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Please
add any other comments where relevant Damp pitch due to heavy rainfall in
the week but had no effect on the game
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Please rate
the pitch and issue a mark as outlined in the guideline table |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
17-20 |
Good 14-16 |
Above Average 10-13 |
Below Average 7-9 |
Poor 1-6 |
Unfit 0 |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Umpire 1 Name: |
|
Signature: |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Umpire 2 Name: |
|
Signature: |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Teams: Home: |
|
Away: |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Competition: |
|
Date: |
|
|||||||||||||
![]()
![]()
|
Criteria ·
These
criteria are to be used for marking pitches for a one day league game. Always take into consideration the
quality and ability of the bowlers, newness of the ball, and prevailing
atmospheric conditions that may influence the amount of movement. ·
Any
variation in performance should be as a result of the quality of the pitch
only. |
||
|
Categories |
Grade |
Criteria |
|
Very Good |
5 |
·
Good carry, limited seam movement and consistent bounce throughout,
little or no turn, recognising that the
quality and ability of bowlers may influence amounts of pace, bounce
and turn when assessing the pitch ·
But natural wear sufficient to be responsive to spin later in the
game. |
|
Good |
4 |
Average carry, limited seam movement, consistent bounce
throughout, natural wear sufficient to be responsive to spin later in the
game, though not quite meeting the criteria for carry and bounce for a
"very good" pitch |
|
Above
Average |
3 |
Lacks carry, and/or bounce and/or occasional seam
movement, but consistent in carry and bounce. A degree of turn, but with
average bounce for the spinner. Falling significantly short of "very
good" with respect to carry, bounce and turn. |
|
Below
Average |
2 |
Either very little carry and/or bounce and/or more than occasional
seam movement, or occasional variable (but not excessive or dangerous) bounce
and/or occasional variable carry. If a pitch demonstrates these features,
then the pitch cannot be rated in a higher category regardless of the
amount of turn the pitch displays at any stage of the match. |
|
Poor |
1 |
If any of the
following criteria apply, a pitch may be rated "poor": ·
The pitch offers excessive seam movement at any
stage of the match ·
The pitch displays excessive unevenness of
bounce for any bowler at any stage of the match ·
The pitch offers excessive assistance to spin
bowlers, especially early in the match |
|
Unfit |
0 |
The pitch is rated as dangerous
if: ·
The pitch is excessively wet and
slippery whereby players cannot gain a safe foothold. Wet areas may be
localised to bowlers run-ups and/or areas on the pitch where the ball is
likely to land, or in patches on the outfield ·
The pitch surface may be or become
so dry or looses that the ball explodes through the surface and may fly
unpredictably and dangerously ·
Bowlers footholds have not been properly and
safely repaired ·
The Pitch/outfield has been vandalised in any way and is unfit for use |
|
|
|||||
|
Grading Criteria |
Unevenness |
Appearance / Grass Length |
Boundary markings |
Sightscreens |
Marks |
|
Very Good |
None |
Cut &
striped Below
3/4" (20mm) No Grass
Cuttings |
Rope or Fence
in good condition Very clear line with marks at 20 yd Intervals |
Good condition. In place Height / Width
OK Easy to Move |
5 |
|
Good |
Little |
Cut Below
3/4" (20mm) No Grass
Cuttings |
Rope or Fence
in good condition Clear
line Clear marks at
20 yd Intervals |
Good condition Height / Width
OK Easy to Move |
4 |
|
Above Average |
Slightly uneven |
Cut &/or
striped Below
3/4" (20mm) Some cutting left |
Rope or Fence in
reasonable Condition Clear Marks |
Adequate Size Reasonable
Condition Easy to Move |
3 |
|
Below Average |
Very uneven |
Cut longer
than 3/4" (20mm).
Impairs ball movement |
Condition less
than above Markings not clear |
Not large
enough. Hard to move |
2 |
|
Poor |
Excessive unevenness |
Long Grass.
Impairs free ball
movement |
No Clear
Markings |
Not Adequate Poor Condition Hard to Move |
1 |
|
An outfield is only rated unfit if it is dangerous |
0 |
||||
|
Marks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Add up the scores for each of the Categories to provide
the Total Outfield Score. |
|
||||
GROUND MARKING GRID FOR 1ST Xls on MATCH REPORT SHEET
|
PITCH |
Inconsistency |
Seam movement |
Carry & Bounce |
Turn |
Mark /20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wet
/ Dry |
Grass cover Y / N |
Markings Y / N |
Repair Y / N |
|
|
OUTFIELD |
Uneveness |
Grass etc |
Boundary |
Sightscreens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circle |
Scoreboard |
Good Ave BS |
Scorers |
Good Ave BS |
|
|
|
Scorebox |
Good Ave BS |
Umpires Room |
Good Ave BS |
|
2nd
Xl Captains Pitch Marking 2010
1st Xl matches are being marked by the Umpires using an
experimental ECB system which awards marks out of 20 for both pitch and
outfield.
Please continue
to mark as we always have:
Good (5marks), Average (3marks), Below Standard (0 marks).
The marks for 2nd
Xl pitches last year were high indicating a high
standard.
Extract from 2010
Ground Criteria:
PITCHES: The objective is that the whole pitch should be firm, dry and true,
providing good carry and consistent bounce with little seam movement
throughout. In all cases pitches will be judged on how they play and not
whether they are dry and what colour they look. Pitches should be marked out to
current regulations (see handbook diagram). Creases should always be re-marked
between innings.
WICKET ROLLING
The ECB have paid
The report can be downloaded from the ECB
publications section on play-cricket,com
and the link below. This also takes you to videos of the research on utube, Please bring
this research to the attention of your groundsman.
Centre for Sports Surface Technology
Page 29 of 34
www.cranfield.ac.uk/sas/sst
İ Cranfield University,
2009
4. A total of 10 passes (with a two drum roller) should do
it.
Summer pre-match rolling requires a maximum of 10 roller passes (two drum
roller) to achieve the roller compactive
potential. With low clay soil this should be
done in the period 36 to 56 hours after saturation in one or two
sessions and with
the maximum roller weight for at least six of these passes. After
this time the full
compactive potential of the roller will not be achieved.
For the high clay soil, the drying to optimum moisture
content time is more likely
to be influenced by the ambient weather conditions. However the
following regime
with a two drum roller is suggested:
An initial
rolling of two passes within 48 to 72 hours, preferably with the
maximum roller weight but make sure that it is not too wet as
there is a risk
of horizontal soil movement (this depends on the initial pitch
density).
A further four
roller passes per day for the next two days should be
sufficient to achieve maximum potential.
A total of 10
roller passes with at least the last six roller passes with the maximum roller
weight. The timings of these will change according to the weather
conditions
however it is important not to leave rolling until the soil has
dried below the
optimum.
Further rolling beyond the recommended 10 roller passes is
unlikely to
increase pitch density and for reasons discussed previously should
be only
undertaken for other playability reasons. For this purpose it would
be
prudent to consider using a lighter roller to prevent excessive
horizontal
soil stress.